After a week in which she was stretchered out of her home to an ambulance, held in hospital for tests and stripped of access rights to her children, Britney Spears has had at least one piece of good news.
Her new single is a hit in Britain. Languishing at number 46 last week, Piece of Me went to 19 in this week's singles chart.
Miss Spears is now understood to be at home in Los Angeles after being released from the city's Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre on Saturday.
She was taken there on Thursday night after police feared for her welfare after a stand-off inside the house over custody of her two young children.
The singer had limited access to Sean Preston, two, and Jayden James, one, because of her alcohol and drugs problems. She reportedly refused to hand over Jayden to her former husband and barricaded herself inside a room.
Although police initially believed she was intoxicated, there have been claims that she is suffering from bi-polar disorder, a form of depression.
A source close to the singer confirmed that Miss Spears's latest problems were not related to drink or drugs.
The singer reportedly left hospital through a tunnel to avoid photographers.
Doctors are understood to have decided on Saturday that she no longer posed a risk to herself.
Dr Phil McGraw, a television therapist, visited Miss Spears, 26, shortly before she was discharged and said he was "very concerned for her".
He told the television show Entertainment Tonight: "My meeting with Britney and some of her family members this morning in her room at Cedars leaves me convinced more than ever that she is in dire need of both medical and psychological intervention."
On Friday, Kevin Federline, her former husband, went to court and was granted "sole physical custody" of th e children until a decision on their future by the Superior Court of California on Jan 14.
news articles : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/
Monday, January 7, 2008
Good news at last for Britney Spears
Friday, January 4, 2008
Britney Spears Dumped by Lawyers…Again
Happy new year, Britney Spears!
The trainwreck's lawyers have quit. The firm of Trope and Trope filed legal papers on Wednesday, withdrawing themselves as Britney's representatives in her drawn-out bitter baby battle against Kevin Federline.
It seems like working with Britney is just too hard! Last year, Spear's previous lawyer, Laura Wasser, also quit.
In the Motion To Be Relieved as Counsel, Trope and Trope say, "there has been a breakdown in communications between [Britney] and Trope and Trope making further representation of her interests impossible."
[UPDATED: Britney finally showed up late to her depo and it is reported that her lawyers must stay with her until she fires them or she finds other representation. See more at the latest News posts.
news source : http://www.2snaps.tv/9813630
Wednesday, January 2, 2008
For Celebrity Magazine, Pregnancy Is a Bonus
OK!, the celebrity magazine, could not possibly have purchased all the attention it enjoyed in late December after it got the scoop that Jamie Lynn Spears, the younger and until then less sensational sister of the troubled pop queen Britney Spears, was three months pregnant.
Or could it? It is widely assumed within the publishing industry that OK! paid the Spears family for the exclusive rights to the pregnancy news. US Weekly, another celebrity magazine, cited sources who said that Jamie Lynn’s mother, Lynne Spears, had sold the pregnancy story for $1 million, printing the assertion on the cover of last week’s issue.
Checkbook journalism is hardly a secret within the star-struck world of glossy magazines. The publications often pay for photos of weddings and babies, perhaps most famously in June 2006 when People won a fierce bidding war for the first photos of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s daughter, Shiloh.
Although People said that the widely reported $4.1 million price tag was not accurate, it did not offer an alternative figure; editors say that disclosing prices would work against efforts to keep costs down.
Purchasing news of a pregnancy, however, is unusual. The two-year-old American edition of OK!, like its 14-year-old British counterpart, has freely acknowledged paying for “relationships” with some celebrities, but Sarah Ivens, editor of the American edition, declined to discuss specific deals or dollar figures.
“If there’s something out there, there will be a bidding war,” Ms. Ivens said. “We’re not bidding against ourselves.”
When asked why she was less hesitant than some competitors to acknowledge the purchase of photos, Ms. Ivens said: “I’m not very good at lying.”
The interview with Jamie Lynn, 16, and her mother certainly drew copious attention to OK!, which sells far fewer copies than competitors like People and US Weekly, and provoked speculation about the relationship between OK! and the Spears family, which had been strained by a disastrous photo shoot with Britney six months ago.
But Ms. Ivens kept in touch with the Spears family — she said that she spoke regularly to its members — and said that when the family decided to announce Jamie Lynn’s pregnancy, it contacted OK! first. The six-page interview barely mentioned Britney.
Word of the 16-year-old star’s pregnancy — and of OK!’s exclusive on the story — seeped out on the Internet on Dec. 18. By the next day, when the magazine reached newsstands, the news was splashed across the cover of The New York Post, treated as the lead story on NBC’s “Today” show and publicized on the home page of People.com. In each case OK! was cited as breaking the story.
Tom Morrissy, publisher of the American version of OK!, promptly sent an e-mail message to prospective advertisers extolling all the coverage the story had received. The Jamie Lynn issue of OK! sold a record number of copies — nearly two million, roughly twice the usual number.
“What advertisers care about are buzz-worthy stories and volume,” Mr. Morrissy said. He said that OK!’s financial arrangements with celebrities had not factored into its conversations with advertisers.
Securing such scoops, whatever their cost, seems to be part of OK!’s growth strategy, as each exclusive article raises awareness of the brand. In 2007 the OK! publications, which are owned by Northern & Shell, a British media company, secured the first photos of Eva Longoria’s wedding and of Larry Birkhead and Anna Nicole Smith’s daughter, Dannielynn.
The magazine’s latest photo exclusive of the wedding of Katherine Heigl, a star of “Grey’s Anatomy,” was published this week.
Some celebrity-watchers have speculated that the Spears family would be paid not for the pregnancy news, but for the first photos of the mother and baby sometime next year. The spokeswoman for Jamie Lynn Spears and representatives for the Spears family did not return phone calls or e-mail messages, and Ms. Ivens would not clarify the matter.
To the outside world, OK! did not look like the logical choice for the Spears family to take the story. Back in July Britney Spears had agreed to sit for an OK! interview and cover shoot — pitched as a friendly “comeback” profile of the increasingly ridiculed entertainer — but had acted erratically, destroyed expensive dresses and abruptly walked out.
After news of the photo shoot leaked to gossip Web sites, the magazine decided to publish a three-page depiction of the day. The issue, headlined “Britney’s Meltdown,” sold 1.2 million copies, the magazine’s best performance at the time.
The text was still relatively delicate, concluding: “At OK! we’d love to have our old Britney back. But what we experienced was a young girl who is desperately in need of help.” Still, the article suggested that Ms. Ivens would start taking a harder line toward the celebrities it typically fawned over.
“We got tougher,” Ms. Ivens said. “But the truth is, everyone in the family came back to OK! We have a really good, trusting relationship with the Spears family, and the story didn’t change that.”
news source : http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/business/media/02ok.html?_r=1&ref=media&oref=slogin
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Louis Vuitton wins suit against Britney Spears
20.Nov.07 5:00pm
French luxury goods company Louis Vuitton has won a lawsuit against Britney Spears.
Vuitton filed suit against the pop star for showing a pink Vuitton-upholstered dashboard in her music video for 'Do Something'.
The video shows Spears driving in a pink Hummer and tapping her fingers on a dashboard that resembles Vuitton's 'Cherry Blossoms' design.
A Paris civil court ordered Sony BMG and MTV Online to stop broadcasting or marketing the video and fined them 80,000 euros apiece, reports the Associated Press. They were also found guilty of violating counterfeiting laws.
Spears herself was not fined or found guilty.
news source : http://www.nme.com/news/
Thursday, November 15, 2007
Britney Spears Gives Back
The pop star will be auctioning off a signed copy of her latest CD, Blackout, on ebay with photo agency X17.
The money raised will go to UNICEF.
The 25-year-old said in a press release, “I think it’s important to give back and with the release of Blackout, this seemed like the perfect opportunity”.
news source : http://www.eontarionow.com/
Monday, November 5, 2007
Britney Spears' lavish spending habits revealed
Life may be hard at present for US pop diva Britney Spears, but she must take some comfort from the thousands of pounds she has to spend on clothes, dining out and partying each month.
The 25-year-old was forced to reveal her lavish spending habits as part of the long-running court dispute between her and ex-husband Kevin Federline for custody rights over the couple's two children, Sean, 1, and Jayden, 2.
The pair were sent to live with their father last month after Spears drove without a valid licence.
According to court documents, Spears has around $737,000 (£352,775) to play with each month.
A notorious party animal since her divorce from dancer-turned-rapper Federline in July, she splashes out $102,000 (£48,823) on entertainment, gifts and holidays, $16,000 (£7,658) to ensure she never need wear the same outfit twice and $4,758 (£2,277) eating out.
Combined, the $122,758 (£58,759) a month - or $1.47m (£705,118) a year - the troubled star spends enjoying herself dwarfs the $500 (£239) a month or $6,000 (£2,872) a year she gives to charity.
To counter her hedonistic lifestyle, the diva spends $86,397 (£41,355) on health insurance premiums and other medical costs - believed to include regular stays in rehabilitation.
She also spends $61,271 (£29,387) on mortgage payments on her two US homes. And she still pays her ex-husband a total of $15,000 (£7,180) in child support and $20,000 (£9,573) in spousal support, although the latter ends on November 15.
Federline, by comparison, is a model of frugality. His biggest monthly expenses include $7,500 (£3,590) in rent and $6,000 (£2,872) in security, according to his financial declaration.
His clothing budget is an eighth the size of his former wife's at just $2,000 (£957) a month. He also spends about twenty times less - $5,000 (£2,393) - on entertainment, gifts and holidays, and three times less - $1,500 (£718) - on eating out.
Federline earned more than $500,000 (£239,332) in 2006, mainly from entertainment and endorsement deals, but after business expenses, he took home just $7,436 (£3,559) that year.
Spears' $100m fortune - accumulated through the sale of over 76 million records worldwide since she shot to fame a decade ago - looks set to inflate further with the release next week of her first album in four years, Blackout.
The title "refers to blocking out negativity and embracing life fully," said the star's record label Jive, and is expected to sell well, despite Spears' refusal to promote it.
The court documents released also revealed that Spears' children were removed from her custody last month because she was photographed defying an order not to drive them until she had a valid driving licence.
She subsequently obtained a temporary licence.
News Source : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/